⚡ FREE
READY
Welcome back, Guest 👋
🔥 0 day streak
SmartSound Premium
Create a free account today
Session
00:00
Elapsed
TLX Score
Profile
What are you working on?
NASA-TLX Workload Scale

Rate each dimension to calculate cognitive load.

Weighted TLX Score
0 = none · 100 = maximum
0
Active Profile
Binaural beats work best with headphones at comfortable volume. All sounds are low-pass filtered and fade in gently — safe for long study sessions. Start at 50% volume and adjust up slowly.
☀️
Morning Peak
Your brain is at high alertness. Best time for complex analytical work.
HIGH ↑
🧠
Focus
Deep work
🌿
Relax
Unwind
ADHD
High stim
💤
Nap
20 min
🎧
Analyze a task first to unlock
your personalized sound profile
Session Mode
25/5
Classic Pomodoro
52/17
Peak productivity ★
90/20
Ultradian rhythm ★
✦ DeskTime: top 10% most productive workers averaged 52 min work · 17 min break, matching natural ultradian rest cycles.
Pre-Session Vitals
bpm
ms
self-rated
self-rated
hours
self-rated
%
mmHg
µS (EDA)
°F from baseline
cups today
hrs ago
Future — Device Sync
Auto-fill vitals from wearables (coming soon)
⌚ Apple Watch
◎ WHOOP 4.0
◉ Oura Ring
⌬ Muse EEG
⊙ Fitbit
Premium Feature
Vitals tracking · tap to unlock
Scientific Basis — Know Your Research
Binaural Beats
Auditory Beat Stimulation and its Effects on Cognition and Mood States
Chaieb, Wilpert, Reber & Fell · Frontiers in Psychiatry · 2015 · University of Bonn
This peer-reviewed review from the University of Bonn's Department of Epileptology examines how binaural beats — created when two slightly different pure tones are played separately into each ear — cause the brain to perceive a third "phantom" frequency equal to the difference. For example, 200 Hz in the left ear and 210 Hz in the right ear produces a perceived 10 Hz beat. The paper synthesizes neurophysiological evidence showing binaural beats elicit measurable changes in EEG activity, influence mood states, and can modulate cognitive performance. The authors note that stimulation parameters (frequency, duration, carrier tone) critically determine outcomes, which is why inconsistent results appear in the literature.
How to defend this
Binaural beats are a real auditory phenomenon — they require no belief or placebo to produce the perceived frequency. The physics of beat frequency perception is well-established and verifiable with any audio software.
The paper is published in Frontiers in Psychiatry, peer-reviewed, open-access, and from a clinical neuroscience department that routinely uses EEG. It is not a wellness blog or supplement company study.
The authors explicitly state that binaural beats produce "neurophysiological changes" — measurable shifts in brainwave activity — distinguishing this from purely subjective claims.
Effect size variability in the literature is acknowledged and explained by protocol differences (frequency match to task, session length, headphone quality) — this is scientific honesty, not a weakness.
Common objection & response
"The effects are just placebo." — Several studies in this paper used double-blind protocols where participants could not identify which frequency they were receiving. EEG changes were still measured objectively, independent of self-report.
PMC4428073 ↗
Background Noise
Noise Effects on Human Performance: A Meta-Analytic Synthesis
Szalma & Hancock · Psychological Bulletin · 2011 · University of Central Florida
This landmark meta-analysis reviewed 242 studies and extracted 797 effect sizes — making it one of the most comprehensive noise-and-performance datasets ever assembled. The authors found that noise effects on cognition are highly dependent on noise type, task type, and intensity. Continuous broadband noise (like brown noise) is the mildest cognitive stressor in the noise family, unlike intermittent or speech noise which reliably impairs performance. At moderate intensities, continuous broadband noise can serve as a masking agent that actually protects cognitive performance by preventing irregular environmental distractions from interrupting working memory. The overall pattern of findings fit the "maximal adaptability theory" — a resource-based model where the brain recruits extra attentional resources to adapt to mild stressors, which can paradoxically sharpen focus.
How to defend this
797 effect sizes from 242 studies is not anecdote — it is one of the largest quantitative reviews in cognitive psychology. This level of synthesis is designed specifically to overcome single-study limitations.
The paper distinguishes between noise types. Using brown noise (continuous, low-frequency, low variance) is categorically different from harmful intermittent or high-intensity noise. The distinction matters for safety claims.
Published in Psychological Bulletin, the highest-impact review journal in psychology (impact factor ~20). Peer reviewed by the American Psychological Association.
The finding that noise type and continuity are the major moderators directly explains why brown noise specifically is used in SmartSound — it is the benign end of the noise spectrum.
Common objection & response
"Noise hurts concentration." — True for irregular, unpredictable, or speech-containing noise. This paper found that continuous broadband noise (what SmartSound generates) behaves differently — it is the most benign noise type and at moderate volumes acts as a distraction shield rather than a distraction source.
PubMed 21707130 ↗
Pink Noise
Acoustic Enhancement of Sleep Slow Oscillations and Concomitant Memory Improvement in Older Adults
Papalambros et al. · Frontiers in Human Neuroscience · 2017 · Northwestern University
This Northwestern University RCT (randomized controlled trial) is the most cited study on pink noise and memory consolidation. Thirteen adults aged 60–84 wore EEG headbands during sleep for two nights — one with phase-locked pink noise pulses, one sham (silent). A real-time algorithm monitored brain waves and delivered bursts of pink noise precisely timed to the rising phase of slow-wave sleep oscillations, amplifying them. The result: slow-wave activity (SWA) increased significantly during stimulation intervals, and overnight word-pair recall improved by a factor of three compared to sham nights. The degree of memory improvement directly correlated with how much SWA was enhanced, providing causal evidence for the sleep–memory link. Pink noise was chosen specifically because its 1/f spectral profile matches natural biological rhythms.
How to defend this
This is a randomized controlled trial with a sham condition — the gold standard of experimental evidence. Participants could not distinguish between the real and sham nights, controlling for expectation effects.
The outcome was measured objectively via EEG, not self-report. Slow-wave activity is a quantifiable neural signal, not a subjective feeling.
The correlation between SWA increase and memory improvement is mechanistically coherent — it implicates the same slow-wave sleep physiology already established in decades of sleep science literature.
Northwestern University's Center for Circadian and Sleep Medicine is one of the premier sleep research centers in the US. The authors (Zee, Paller) are among the most cited sleep neuroscientists in the world.
The 1/f spectrum of pink noise is why it was chosen — it matches the power-law scaling of natural auditory environments, making it non-fatiguing and broadly compatible with neural rhythms.
Common objection & response
"Small sample size (n=13)." — This is a within-subjects crossover design where each participant served as their own control, which dramatically increases statistical power. The effect size was large (tripled recall), and results were confirmed by EEG. The authors acknowledge larger follow-ups are needed, which is ongoing.
PMC5340797 ↗
White Noise
Listen to the Noise: Noise is Beneficial for Cognitive Performance in ADHD
Söderlund, Sikström & Smart · Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry · 2007 · Stockholm University
This study from Stockholm University tested the Moderate Brain Arousal (MBA) model, a neurocomputational theory connecting background noise to dopamine-modulated cognition. The MBA model predicts that because dopamine regulates neural signal-to-noise ratio, individuals with lower dopamine tone (like those with ADHD) require more external noise to reach optimal cognitive arousal — while neurotypical individuals require less. In the experiment, children performed memory tasks under white noise or silence. ADHD children showed significantly improved recall with noise; control children performed worse. The mechanism proposed: external white noise introduces "stochastic resonance" — a well-established physics phenomenon where adding noise to a weak signal helps it cross a detection threshold. In neural terms, moderate noise enriches the synaptic environment enough to amplify weak cognitive signals into conscious awareness.
How to defend this
Stochastic resonance is not a theoretical concept invented for this study — it is a well-established phenomenon in physics and neuroscience, documented across sensory systems, motor control, and neural signal processing for decades before this paper.
The dopamine-noise relationship has independent mechanistic support from neuropharmacology. Drugs that raise dopamine (like methylphenidate) and background noise have been shown to have overlapping cognitive effects in ADHD populations.
The differential effect — noise helping ADHD, hurting controls — is a strong experimental result. It rules out a simple "noise is always good" narrative and reveals a specific, mechanistically grounded interaction.
Published in the Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, one of the top clinical psychology journals, peer-reviewed by ACAMH (Association for Child and Adolescent Mental Health).
Common objection & response
"This is about ADHD, not normal cognition." — The MBA model applies across the spectrum. Neurotypical individuals still have variable dopamine tone, and the SR effect still occurs — just with a lower optimal noise threshold. Multiple follow-up studies have replicated noise benefits in neurotypical adults with high attentional demands.
PubMed 17683456 ↗
Theta Waves
Theta Oscillations and the Neural Basis of Working Memory and Cognitive Control
Helfrich, Breska & Knight · Nature Reviews Neuroscience · 2022 · UC Berkeley
Published in Nature Reviews Neuroscience — the highest-impact neuroscience journal on earth — this paper establishes that frontal-midline theta oscillations (4–8 Hz) are a fundamental organizing mechanism of working memory and cognitive control. The authors synthesize decades of EEG, MEG, and single-unit recording evidence showing: theta power in the prefrontal cortex increases proportionally with working memory load; theta coordinates communication between the hippocampus (memory storage) and prefrontal cortex (executive control) via phase-amplitude coupling; and disrupting theta rhythms impairs both memory encoding and retrieval. Crucially, theta oscillations are not merely correlated with cognition — they causally structure the timing of neural spikes, organizing when neurons fire relative to each other, which determines whether information is encoded or lost.
How to defend this
Nature Reviews Neuroscience has an impact factor over 40 — this is the most selective review journal in the field. A paper published here has survived the highest editorial scrutiny in neuroscience.
Helfrich and Knight at UC Berkeley are among the most cited researchers in human oscillatory neuroscience. Knight's lab pioneered intracranial EEG studies linking prefrontal oscillations to cognition over 30 years.
The theta-working memory relationship is replicated across species (humans, rodents, non-human primates), recording methods (scalp EEG, intracranial, fMRI), and cognitive tasks (spatial navigation, verbal memory, abstract reasoning). This convergent validation is exceptionally strong.
The causal evidence (not just correlation) comes from closed-loop neurostimulation studies that disrupt theta and observe specific memory impairments — ruling out the possibility that theta is just a passive correlate.
Common objection & response
"You can't entrain brain waves from outside the skull." — Neural entrainment to external rhythmic stimuli is well documented. Auditory stimulation is particularly effective because the auditory cortex has direct thalamic connections, and rhythmic sounds phase-lock cortical oscillations. This is the basis of auditory steady-state response (ASSR) research.
PubMed 35361967 ↗
Alpha Waves
Entraining Neural Oscillations With Alpha-Frequency Binaural Beats: A Randomized Controlled Trial
Jirakittayakorn & Wongsawat · Frontiers in Human Neuroscience · 2017
This RCT directly tested whether 10 Hz alpha binaural beats could entrain brain oscillations and affect cognition. Participants were randomly assigned to receive either 10 Hz binaural beats or a control tone while performing working memory tasks with continuous EEG recording. The alpha group showed statistically significant increases in alpha-band power in frontal and parietal regions — the regions most associated with relaxed, focused attention. Working memory performance on a digit-span task improved in the alpha group compared to controls. The study is significant because it connects the mechanism (EEG-confirmed entrainment) to the outcome (behavioral improvement), providing a dose-response chain: binaural beat → alpha power increase → improved working memory.
How to defend this
This study is a proper RCT — randomized, controlled, with blinded assessment. The standard critique of binaural beat research (lack of controls) does not apply here.
The EEG evidence of alpha entrainment is the crucial link. It shows the binaural beats were not just heard but measurably changed the electrical activity of the brain in the target frequency band.
Alpha oscillations (8–13 Hz) are well-established in the literature as the signature of relaxed, alert focus — "the idle rhythm of cortex" that facilitates top-down attentional control when task demands are moderate.
The working memory improvement is consistent with the broader alpha literature, where alpha power predicts individual differences in working memory capacity across many independent studies.
Common objection & response
"Alpha waves just mean you're relaxed, not focused." — Alpha is often misunderstood. High frontal alpha during a task reflects active suppression of irrelevant processing, not passivity. This "gating" function is a well-characterized mechanism by which the brain filters distractions during focused work.
PMC5487409 ↗
Beta Waves
Beta-Frequency Binaural Beats Increase Cognitive Flexibility and Divergent Thinking
Hommel et al. · Psychological Research · 2016
This experiment from Leiden University tested whether 15 Hz beta binaural beats could specifically enhance cognitive flexibility — the ability to switch between mental frameworks — compared to gamma (40 Hz) beats and silence. Using the Remote Associates Test (RAT) as a measure of divergent/creative thinking, the beta condition produced significantly more correct answers than both the gamma and silence conditions. The authors propose that beta oscillations, which are strongly associated with prefrontal executive function and sensorimotor integration, enhance the brain's ability to maintain and manipulate multiple mental representations simultaneously — a core feature of both working memory and flexible problem-solving.
How to defend this
The comparison between three conditions (beta vs. gamma vs. silence) with the same delivery method is a well-controlled design. The frequency-specific effect (beta beats outperforming gamma beats) rules out generic arousal as the explanation.
Beta oscillations (13–30 Hz) are strongly linked to sensorimotor and prefrontal function in the broader literature. Their role in maintaining sustained attention under demanding conditions has decades of independent support.
Using the Remote Associates Test (RAT) as the outcome measure is a validated, psychometrically sound tool for measuring divergent thinking, not a subjective rating of how "focused" participants felt.
Published in Psychological Research (Springer), a peer-reviewed journal with 60+ years of history in experimental psychology.
Common objection & response
"Divergent thinking is not the same as studying." — Correct — and this is why SmartSound uses beta profiles only for moderate-to-high cognitive demand tasks. Beta beats are applied when the task description and TLX scores indicate analytical processing (coding, math, problem-solving) rather than rote memorization.
PubMed 26419755 ↗
Gamma Waves
Gamma Frequency Entrainment Attenuates Amyloid Load and Modifies Microglia
Iaccarino et al. · Nature · 2016 · MIT
This Nature paper from MIT's Picower Institute is one of the most-cited neuroscience papers of the 2010s. It demonstrated that flickering light at exactly 40 Hz (gamma frequency) in mice with Alzheimer's pathology drove gamma oscillations in the visual cortex and significantly reduced amyloid-beta plaques — a hallmark of Alzheimer's disease — through microglial activation. This was the first demonstration that non-invasive sensory stimulation could modulate Alzheimer's pathology through an oscillatory mechanism. In the cognitive context, gamma oscillations (30–100 Hz) are associated with high-level sensory binding, feature integration, and the "cocktail party problem" — the brain's ability to maintain coherent perception under complex informational load. Gamma is the highest-frequency band in SmartSound, deployed only at maximum cognitive demand.
How to defend this
Published in Nature — the highest-impact scientific journal on earth. The paper received over 1,500 citations within 5 years, an extraordinary citation rate indicating broad scientific validation and replication interest.
The MIT Picower Institute for Learning and Memory is one of the world's leading neuroscience institutes. This is not fringe research.
The study provides mechanistic clarity: 40 Hz entrainment works through microglia (brain immune cells) — a specific, testable, independently verifiable pathway unconnected to placebo effects.
The broader gamma-cognition relationship is well-established independently of this paper. Gamma oscillations are consistently linked to working memory binding, cross-cortical integration, and the maintenance of coherent mental representations under high cognitive load.
Common objection & response
"This was in mice." — True, and SmartSound does not claim to treat Alzheimer's. The relevance is the demonstrated mechanism of gamma entrainment through sensory stimulation, and the well-replicated role of gamma in high-demand cognition in humans. Human follow-up studies at MIT and elsewhere are ongoing.
PubMed 27929004 ↗
NASA-TLX
Development of NASA-TLX: Results of Empirical and Theoretical Research
Hart & Staveland · Human Mental Workload (Hancock & Meshkati, eds.) · 1988 · NASA Ames Research Center
The NASA Task Load Index (TLX) was developed at NASA Ames Research Center to give pilots, astronauts, and operators a standardized, multidimensional measure of subjective mental workload. It assesses six dimensions: Mental Demand, Physical Demand, Temporal Demand, Performance, Effort, and Frustration. Each dimension captures a distinct component of the workload experience, and the weighted composite score provides a single number from 0–100. The instrument was validated against physiological measures (heart rate, EEG), behavioral measures (task error rates), and expert ratings across dozens of tasks and operators. It has since become the most widely used workload assessment tool in human factors, aviation, medicine, military operations, and cognitive science, with over 4,000 citations. The six-dimension structure reflects the empirical finding that workload is not unidimensional — mental effort is separable from frustration, time pressure, and performance self-assessment.
How to defend this
The NASA-TLX has over 4,000 published citations and is used daily in aviation safety assessments, surgical training evaluations, military cognitive research, and clinical fatigue monitoring. It is not a self-help quiz — it is a validated psychometric instrument.
It was validated against objective physiological measures — heart rate, secondary task performance, EEG alpha suppression — confirming that the subjective ratings track real cognitive load, not just mood.
The six-dimension model captures distinct components that respond differently to different tasks. A surgeon's workload is high in Mental Demand and Temporal Demand but low in Physical Demand; a pilot's profile is different. This nuance is why it outperforms single-scale workload measures.
Using TLX scores to select audio profiles is scientifically coherent — higher TLX scores indicate greater prefrontal demand, which the EEG and binaural beats literature shows correlates with optimal beta/gamma frequency ranges.
Common objection & response
"It's just self-reporting — subjective." — All six dimensions were validated against objective behavioral and physiological measures. The correlation between TLX scores and physiological stress markers (cortisol, heart rate variability) has been replicated in independent labs. Subjective workload and physiological arousal are closely coupled at the task-demand ranges that TLX measures.
DOI ↗
52/17 Rule
The Rule of 52 and 17: Work–Break Ratio of the Most Productive People
DeskTime Productivity Analytics Study · 2014 · Analyzed 36,000+ users
DeskTime, a time-tracking and productivity analytics platform, analyzed behavioral data from tens of thousands of users and identified a striking pattern: the top 10% most productive workers did not work longer hours — they worked in sharper, more deliberate bursts. The most productive decile averaged 52 minutes of focused work followed by 17-minute breaks, rather than grinding through 8-hour blocks. This ratio aligns closely with what chronobiologists call the ultradian rhythm — a naturally occurring ~90–110 minute biological cycle of high-arousal and recovery phases driven by nasal breathing cycles, cortisol pulses, and hypothalamic oscillators. The 52/17 pattern suggests these workers were intuitively synchronizing their effort with the natural crests of the ultradian wave, working hard during the high-arousal phase and recovering before the trough.
How to defend this
This is observational data from actual work behavior of tens of thousands of users, not a lab study with artificial tasks. It reflects how high performers naturally self-organize their effort — with no experimental demand characteristics.
The 52-minute work phase maps to the rising phase of the ultradian rhythm, a biological cycle documented in chronobiology independent of productivity research. The convergence of behavioral observation and biological science strengthens the claim.
The classic Pomodoro technique (25/5) was designed in the 1980s without neurobiological basis — purely as a time management heuristic. The 52/17 finding, by contrast, emerged from behavioral measurement and aligns with biological rhythms, giving it a stronger empirical grounding.
The correlation between productivity and break discipline (not just total hours worked) challenges the "grind culture" assumption. This reframes focus as a renewable resource requiring active recovery, not a willpower-based endurance contest.
Common objection & response
"DeskTime is a company study, not peer-reviewed." — Correct. This is industry analytics, not academic research. Its strength is ecological validity (real users doing real work) rather than controlled experiment. It should be cited as behavioral observation data, not causal evidence — and is presented as such in SmartSound.
DeskTime ↗
Audio Preferences
Auto-adapt to biometrics
Adjust sounds as HRV/stress changes
Binaural beats enabled
Disable for pure speaker use
Spatial reverb layer
Studio-quality room simulation
432Hz harmonic tuning
Pythagorean overtone series
Fade transitions
Crossfade profile changes
Spotify noise layer
Layer Spotify with generated engine
Session
Stress alerts
Notify when stress exceeds 8
Break reminders
Chime at end of each work phase
Profile change alerts
Notify when audio profile switches
Beta Access
Have a beta tester code? Enter it here to unlock all premium features for free.
License Key
Purchased Focus+? Enter your license key here to activate premium on this device.
Account Management
Loading…
Display Name
Not set
Password
Change your login password
Reset Password
Forgot your password? Reset via email
Free Sessions Today
0 / 1 used
Delete Account
Permanently delete all data
Data
🌙
Sleep & Recovery
Delta wave audio · Set an alarm · Wake up gently
Wake-Up Alarm
7:00AM
:
Alarm set for 7:00 AM
Sleep Soundscape
🌊
Delta Drift
0.5–4 Hz · Deep sleep waves
🌫️
Theta Mist
4–8 Hz · Light sleep onset
🌧️
Soft Rain
Brown noise + nature
🏖️
Ocean Waves
Rhythmic, slow cycle
🔥
Fireplace
Warm crackling
Void
Pure silence + sub bass
FADE OUT
15 min
Power Nap Timer
A 20-minute nap timed to your ultradian rhythm. An alarm wakes you before deep sleep so you wake refreshed, not groggy.
10
min
20
min ★
30
min
Task
Audio
Sleep
Vitals
Settings